This purposely makes him less aggressive and controlled his words from being insulting or insinuating anything negative. He was very upset.īesides that, he framed the question On PURPOSE to basically force a Blunt answer from Blizzard, exposing their intent and lack of regard for the main playerbase.įor example, he prefaces the question with 'I saw of lot of features we've been asking for in D3'. His stutter and quivering voice are actually due to held back anger. You need to watch Fluffy's video on the matter. ![]() Days go by and people would realize that D:I has actual canon lore and people would be kinda' mad at that but it wouldnt have been any where near the backlash they got in the West. They could have teased a D4 Logo for 4 seconds and Blizzcon would have been successful. If they did the same with D:I it might not have had the negative impact. That hurt me a abit if a US gamer who has SCBW as his favorite game of all time but they chose to do so because they knew which market they were truly targeting. They announced SC2 was in the works in Seoul South Korea. IMO they shouldn't have announced the damned thing at Blizzcon at all. A D2 Remaster, a D3 Xpac or a D4 logo tease, any of those three. The only way Blizzard could have avoided this was to AT LEAST have another announcement besides D:I and that announcement be PC centric. ![]() It would have prevented the booing but it would not have stopped Red Shirt's question because the perception of the game would have still been very low. ![]() The presence of MTX means that elements of the base gameplay are going to be altered to allow compatibility with what ever intended MTX model they use. The game still promises to be a Microtransactions whore in some way or another. It would have minutely improved the situation. Last updated at 14:00:17 UTC Weekly Help Desk RAGE Loot Thread Trade Thread
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |